There is only one movie studio out there that isÂ pitching a perfect game and that's Pixar. Â All of their films have been huge financial hits and several have won Oscars. Â All of them have over a 90% on RottenTomatoes.com...all of them except one - Cars. Â So why would they select that one for a sequel? Â The reason is simple, it's Disney's bread and butter for selling merchandise to boys. Â So much so that Disneyland is building an entire land dedicated to Cars that opens next year. Â So, I get it. Â But the geniuses at Pixar know that in order to not sully their sterling reputation, they can't just make a sequel for the sake of marketing; they need to reinvent it. Â They did not accomplish that with Cars 2 though.
My issues with the Cars series really kind of shows my colors as a movie snob. Â I enjoy ALL of the Pixar movies, but Cars is certainly my least favorite. Â The reason why is because I consider it to be the least imaginative and original of their pedigree. Â Every single one of the Pixar movies involve these fantastical characters that have crazy adventures. Â But you buy into all of them as an audience member because even when they involve monsters, talking toys or talking fish, they still show how those fantasy characters exist in a real world. Â They show how they interact with humans and make it believable. Â Cars doesn't do that. Â It's our world, but with zero humans and cars just exist without us. Â It's weird and also kept me from really enjoying them. Â That, and I hate NASCAR.
But Cars 2, just like Toy Story 3, isn't simply a repackaging of the original in a crapfest-of-a-sequel. Â They did a decent job of making it its own film with a totally new story. Â In Cars 2, that story is a "spy thriller." Â Clever, especially when you employee the magnificent Michael Caine (The Dark Knight, Inception) as one of the new characters - a super spy named Finn McMissile. Â The action is great and thrilling at times no matter what your age is. Â There's racing, but very little, which is totally fine with me. Â The animation in the film is also one of the highlights. Â It's worth the extra dough for 3D and the colors and clarity is better than any computer animated film I've ever seen.
The problems started when I realized that Lightening McQueen, who's voiced by Owen Wilson, is not the star of this one. Â Sadly, it's his dim-witted counter part, Tow Mater, voiced by Larry the Cable Guy and the only funny thing he's ever done. Â I enjoyed Larry the Cable Guy in Cars but he's like Russell Brand; he's great as a supporting character but annoying and trying as a lead.
Cars 2 is not a bad movie. Â It's good. Â There are vast sequences that made me laugh out loud, mostly brought on by another new Italian character voiced by the awesome John Turturro (Big Lebowski, Transformers) in one of the best performances he's had in years. Â It also has a heartwarming montage set to Weezer (my favorite band) doing a cover of The Cars...again with the cleverness! Â I think the victim here is Pixar itself. Â They have raised the bar so high with their films that we don't expect another animated movie for kids; we expect art. Â Toy Story 3 was the best movie of 2010 and made adults weep buckets. Â The first 10 minutes of Up was more of a sweeping romance than anything that came out in the last decade. Â The final scene of Monsters Inc. is still one of the best, most emotional endings I've ever seen. Â Cars 2, though, is just slightly above another animated movie for kids. Â And that's kind of upsetting.
Cars 2 Â (Rated PG)
Gavin Grade: B
Every year I think it's the Summer of the Superhero! Â A season where the cinemas are filled with a non-stop avalanche of superhero films. Â This year seems to be even worse than last. Â But they're cash cows, commanding the box office with the might the main characters possess. Â The latest is Green Lantern, which stars Ryan Reynolds in his THIRD attempt at playing a superhero (first was in Blade III, second was in Wolverine). Â Luckily, playing pilot Hal Jordan aka Green Lantern is more believable and enjoyable than any of his previous attempts.
Reynolds is joined by the stunningly gorgeous Blake Lively (The Town, Gossip Girl), Mark Strong (Sherlock Holmes), Tim Robbins (Shawshank Redemption) and Peter Sarsgaard (An Education, Jarhead). Â Stealing the show, by far, is Sarsgaard who plays villain Hector Hammond. Â He is downright disturbing as the tortured genius that becomes more and more deformed as the film goes on and his screams of suffering cut right into my nerves like a knife. Â He is almost flawless as a villain for a superhero film. Â He's just over-the-top enough to be enjoyable but skilled enough to be menacing.
The director of Green Lantern is Martin Campbell who has a background in several James Bond films as well as the last Mel Gibson action film, Edge of Darkness. Â You can imagine that Green Lantern is quite a departure for him considering that most of it is very, very heavy in science fiction. Â This isn't the realistic superhero film like The Dark Knight or even the realistic fun superhero film like Iron Man. Â A lot of the movie takes place in space and there are more aliens in it than all of 2010's alien movies combined. Â That doesn't mean it's not good, but it does mean it's not for everyone.
I wonder if that's why every critic seems to be taking great pride and joy in crapping all over it. Â I'm not afraid to say that Green Lantern is a good film. Â I enjoyed it just as much as I enjoyed Thor, maybe even slightly more. Â It's bright, colorful and fun. Â Sure it has a lousy script with cheesy dialogue that makes us wonder if it was scripted by the scribes of a made-for-TV movie, but overall it delivers.
Another area that Green Lantern excels more than I thought it would is in the 3D FX. Â A pleasant surprise considering the fact that if you pay over $10 for a single ticket, I want to see some fun 3D surprises. Â Thor fell WAY flat in that department but Green Lantern is exciting and even gets you to sit back quickly in your seat from some of the FX.
Don't get me wrong...Green Lantern isn't Oscar material or even spectacular filmmaking. Â But is it fun? Â Yup. Â Will it excite you and make you laugh? Â Yes. Â Will you leave the theater feeling like you got your money's worth? Â I did. Â Maybe I enjoyed it so much because I had rock bottom expectations for it, but I feel bad there seems to be an unfounded vendetta among critics against Green Lantern. I can only hope that "by Green Lantern's light" it perseveres anyway.
Green Lantern (Rated PG-13)
Gavin Grade: B